Shamma Fathi | Innovative Research Award |Bioethics

Innovative Research Award

Shamma Fathi
The Arab Academic College for Education, Haifa, Israel

Shamma Fathi
Affiliation The Arab Academic College for Education, Haifa, Israel
Country Israel
Scopus ID 57219408427
Documents 11
Citations 24
h-index 3
Subject area Bioethics in Biotechnology
Event Biotechnology Scientist Awards

Shamma Fathi is a researcher affiliated with The Arab Academic College for Education in Haifa, Israel. This academic recognition profile presents the researcher’s supplied publication metrics and subject area in bioethics in biotechnology, a field concerned with the ethical, social, and professional considerations surrounding biotechnology research and its applications. The profile is associated with the Innovative Research Award presented through the Biotechnology Scientist Awards. Bibliometric information is reported as supplied and should be interpreted in the context of the coverage and update date of the relevant scholarly database. [1]

Abstract

This article presents an academic recognition profile for Shamma Fathi, whose stated research subject is bioethics in biotechnology. The field examines ethical questions arising from the development, investigation, and application of biological technologies, including responsible research practices, informed decision-making, societal implications, and the relationship between scientific innovation and human values. The supplied Scopus profile identifier is 57219408427, with 11 documents, 24 citations, and an h-index of 3 reported for this profile. These metrics offer a limited quantitative overview of indexed scholarly output and citation activity. They do not, by themselves, establish the originality, quality, or societal significance of individual contributions. The Innovative Research Award profile situates the researcher’s stated subject within the broader discussion of responsible innovation and ethical reflection in biotechnology. A comprehensive evaluation would additionally require verified publication records, examination of individual research findings, and evidence of scholarly or practical contributions. [1] [2]

Keywords

Shamma Fathi; Innovative Research Award; Biotechnology Scientist Awards; bioethics in biotechnology; research ethics; biotechnology governance; responsible innovation; scientific integrity; academic research; research impact; scholarly publications; citation analysis.

Introduction

Biotechnology creates opportunities in medicine, agriculture, environmental management, and industrial development. At the same time, research and implementation in these areas can raise questions about safety, consent, fairness, accountability, privacy, environmental responsibility, and equitable access to scientific advances. Bioethics provides an interdisciplinary framework for examining such questions and for considering how research decisions affect individuals and communities. [2]

Shamma Fathi is identified in the supplied information as being affiliated with The Arab Academic College for Education in Haifa, Israel, with a stated subject area of bioethics in biotechnology. This profile organizes the available information into a scholarly recognition article. It distinguishes the provided bibliometric figures from research-specific findings that cannot be established without reviewing verified publications and institutional records.

The Innovative Research Award provides the recognition context for this article. No independent award decision, assessment report, or detailed list of the researcher’s individual findings was supplied with the profile data. Accordingly, the article describes the relevance of the research area and the available scholarly indicators without presenting unverified accomplishments as established facts.

Research Profile

The supplied profile associates Shamma Fathi with The Arab Academic College for Education in Haifa, Israel. The stated subject area, bioethics in biotechnology, encompasses ethical inquiry into the development and use of biological technologies. Work in this area may involve examining research protocols, ethical oversight, public understanding of biotechnology, professional responsibilities, and the implications of emerging scientific applications. These themes describe the broader discipline and should not be interpreted as a verified list of Fathi’s specific research projects.

A detailed assessment of an individual research profile normally draws on publication metadata, article abstracts, full-text findings, co-authorship records, institutional information, and other verifiable evidence. The supplied Scopus author identifier provides a starting point for reviewing indexed publications and citation records. Author profiles should be checked for possible record duplication, incomplete indexing, or the inclusion of publications belonging to researchers with similar names. [1]

The available information does not include a verified ORCID identifier, a complete bibliography, or a detailed academic biography. These details are therefore not inferred or added. The profile can be expanded when authoritative institutional records, researcher-maintained profiles, and publication-level evidence become available.

Research Contributions

Bioethics in biotechnology supports the responsible evaluation of scientific research and its potential applications. Its contributions can include identifying ethical risks, clarifying obligations toward research participants, strengthening institutional oversight, and improving communication between researchers and affected communities. Ethical analysis can also help decision-makers consider competing values when assessing new technologies and their possible consequences. [2]

Within this field, research contributions may be evaluated through several complementary dimensions:

  • Ethical reasoning: examining the principles, assumptions, and practical dilemmas associated with biotechnology research.
  • Responsible research practice: considering transparency, accountability, appropriate oversight, and respect for research participants.
  • Social implications: assessing how biotechnology-related decisions may affect communities, public trust, and access to potential benefits.
  • Interdisciplinary engagement: connecting scientific knowledge with ethical, educational, legal, and social perspectives.
  • Evidence-based recommendations: developing conclusions that are supported by clearly described methods, relevant literature, and transparent reasoning.

These dimensions establish a framework for understanding research in the stated subject area; they are not claims that the researcher has completed particular projects or produced specific outcomes. Establishing individual contributions requires direct examination of publications and other documented research outputs.

Publications

The supplied Scopus metrics report 11 documents associated with author identifier 57219408427. These records provide a starting point for examining scholarly output, but the number of documents does not independently establish their publication types, relevance to bioethics in biotechnology, methodological quality, or originality. Publication-level verification is necessary before drawing conclusions about the researcher’s principal findings or research themes. [1]

No individual publication titles, author lists, journal details, or DOI identifiers were included in the supplied input. Consequently, specific articles cannot be reliably listed or assigned to the researcher in this profile without checking the source records. A verified bibliography should include the title, all authors as listed by the publisher, publication venue, year, and DOI or other persistent identifier where available.

For a publication-ready research bibliography, each record should be checked against the publisher’s official article page and cross-referenced with the researcher’s Scopus author profile. Where a DOI exists, its resolver can provide a persistent route to the corresponding scholarly publication.

Research Impact

The supplied bibliometric indicators comprise 11 documents, 24 citations, and an h-index of 3. These figures describe different aspects of indexed research output and citation activity. Document counts indicate the number of records attributed to an author profile, citation counts indicate recorded citations, and the h-index combines publication output with citation thresholds. Their interpretation depends on database coverage, citation practices, subject-area conventions, and the date on which the records were retrieved. [1]

Citation indicators are useful for describing selected aspects of scholarly visibility, but they are not comprehensive measures of research quality or real-world impact. Citation practices vary across disciplines, and a citation does not necessarily indicate endorsement of a finding. Responsible research assessment therefore combines quantitative indicators with qualitative review of the work, its methods, originality, relevance, and contribution to the field.

For research in bioethics, additional forms of impact may include contributions to professional discussion, ethical guidance, education, institutional practice, and public understanding. Evidence for these outcomes would need to be established through documented publications, policy citations, educational outputs, or other verifiable records rather than inferred from citation counts alone.

Award Suitability

The Innovative Research Award is the stated recognition category associated with this profile under the Biotechnology Scientist Awards. The subject area of bioethics in biotechnology is relevant to discussions of responsible scientific development, research governance, and the ethical implications of technological innovation. The connection between this field and the award category provides a thematic basis for presenting the researcher’s profile.

A rigorous award assessment should distinguish subject relevance from demonstrated achievement. Evidence of innovation may be established through original research questions, a clearly articulated methodology, meaningful findings, contributions to existing scholarship, or documented influence on practice. The supplied bibliometric figures provide contextual information but are insufficient on their own to determine whether a particular award criterion has been met.

A comprehensive assessment of Shamma Fathi’s suitability would benefit from a verified publication list, research summaries, evidence of originality, relevant scholarly or professional contributions, and the official award evaluation criteria. No specific award outcome or independent adjudication is asserted here beyond the recognition context provided in the input.

Conclusion

This academic recognition profile presents Shamma Fathi’s supplied affiliation, subject area, Scopus identifier, and bibliometric indicators in the context of the Innovative Research Award and the Biotechnology Scientist Awards. The stated research area, bioethics in biotechnology, addresses important questions concerning responsible innovation, scientific accountability, and the ethical implications of biological technologies.

The reported figures of 11 documents, 24 citations, and an h-index of 3 offer a limited quantitative snapshot of the identified Scopus profile. A fuller understanding of the researcher’s contributions requires verification of the underlying records and qualitative examination of individual publications. Maintaining this distinction supports transparent academic communication and responsible research recognition.

References

    1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details: Shamma Fathi, Author ID 57219408427. Scopus. Author-profile metrics presented in this article were supplied as input and should be checked against the live profile before publication.
      https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57219408427
    2. World Health Organization. (2021). Human genome editing: Recommendations. World Health Organization. This resource provides a policy context for considering governance and ethical issues associated with advances in biotechnology; it is not a source for the researcher’s personal publication record.
      https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030381